Deveval

Is Your Engineering Team
keeping up with AI?

While competitors ship at 10x speed with AI tools, Deveval shows you exactly where the gap is — with data, not guesswork.

Insights
Average DII
72.43.2
P50 74 · P90 89
Evaluated members
48
5 high-signal profiles
Primary constraint
Delivery
61% of dimension max
Momentum
+3.23.2
vs. previous period

Key Signals

Team-level patterns from latest evaluations

P90 89
Strong code quality

Team scores above 75th percentile across projects

Delivery bottleneck

Shipping velocity below target in 3 projects

Rising collaboration

Cross-team review activity up 18% this quarter

DII Distribution

Impact spread across evaluated members

View all

DII Trend

Average impact score over time

View all

Dimension Health

Scores normalized by each dimension's maximum

View all
Code Quality78%
Delivery61%
Efficiency72%
Collaboration83%

Code Quality vs Delivery

Each point is a member, size = DII

View all
38+
Evaluated teams
122+
Engineers analyzed
5m
Median report time

Reality check

Have you asked these questions?

Most CTOs can't answer these three questions. Deveval makes the answers clear.

01

Are your engineers actually using AI effectively?

Or just going through the motions?

sample signal

AI activity is high, but merged product work is not moving with it.

02

Where does your team's output rank in the industry?

Are similar-sized teams delivering more?

03

Is your AI tooling investment converting to output?

Where is the ROI?

what Deveval returns
Green
12
Watch
5
Review
3

DII

Four dimensions, one score, zero guesswork.

DII measures code quality, delivery capability, engineering efficiency, and contribution breadth from real GitHub data — no surveys, no self-reports.

Developer Impact Index
72/100

One score that compresses quality, delivery, efficiency, and breadth into a conclusion leadership can act on.

needs supporthigh impact
CQ/30

Code Quality

Architecture, maintainability, defect risk, and review signal.

DC/30

Delivery Capability

Business logic shipped, feature completeness, and merged output.

EE/25

Engineering Efficiency

PR cycle time, first-pass rate, and productive AI adoption.

CB/15

Contribution Breadth

Cross-repository ownership, review help, and team leverage.

Impact

Same team, same period, different impact.

DII reveals who is shipping effectively and who needs support — without opinions.

report.snapshot — developer impact
Alice ChenSenior Engineer

Shipped 3 core features this month, effective AI adoption.

87DII
Bob MartinezMid-level Engineer

High AI usage but low output, requires attention.

52DII
Maya TanPlatform Engineer

Strong infra ownership, slower on product-facing work.

73DII

Same headcount, different outcomes.

The report separates productive AI leverage from activity that does not become shipped value.

High impact
80

Ships useful work with clean review signal.

CQClean code
26/30
DCFast delivery
24/30
EEHigh efficiency
20/25
Low impact
33

High effort signals without enough delivered value.

CQNeeds review
12/30
DCLow output
10/30
EESlow cycles
8/25

Benchmark

Know where your team ranks in the industry.

Benchmark data from real customers, continuously updated as the customer base grows.

industry position

Your median team is 14 points below the top quartile.

55
68
82
91
0100
Developer Impact Index
Your top performer
91
Industry top 25%
82
Team median
68
Industry average
55

what this means

The benchmark turns raw team activity into relative position: who is ahead, who is average, and who is dragging below the market.

Use it to decide whether the team needs coaching, process changes, or a harder conversation about AI tooling ROI.

91

current ceiling inside your team

Customers

Real feedback.

From teams already using Deveval to make better decisions.

proof point

We used to track PR count. Then we realized two people were doing almost all the work while others generated tons of AI code that never shipped.

Hao Chen
Founder @ Pixelflow

The board kept asking "is AI actually helping?" — now we finally have a report that answers it.

Marcus Liu
CTO @ Stackline AI

We evaluated our outsourced dev team's actual output with Deveval. Negotiated 30% off the renewal based on the data.

Jing Lin
CEO @ Orbit Commerce

How it works

5 minutes to results.

No meetings, no surveys, no tool installations.

01
< 1 min

Connect GitHub

Sign in, select your repositories.

authorize

02
3-5 min

Auto-analyze

Code quality, AI usage, and delivery evaluated together.

analyze

03
Instant

Get results

Simple, direct, actionable.

deliver

Product

No dashboards, just answers.

Built for people who don't want to stare at charts.

AI usage vs actual output

Identify the gap between AI tool usage and real delivery. The problem lives in that gap.

AI activityHigh
Delivered outputLow

High generation, low merge rate.

Deveval separates tool usage from real delivery impact.

One person, one conclusion

Red/yellow/green status + one-sentence summary for each team member. No charts to interpret.

Alice ChenHealthy
Maya TanWatch
Bob MartinezNeeds review

All contributions at a glance

All repositories aggregated. PRs merged, repos touched, DII score — full picture.

Repos touched12
PRs merged84

Board-ready by default

One-click export a shareable summary. Green/yellow/red counts, key insights, ready for stakeholders.

72avg DII

Comparison

Why not other tools?

Other tools tell you what your team is busy with. Deveval tells you whether they're producing results.

built for AI-era output measurement

Activity tools show motion. Deveval connects AI usage to delivery impact.

6 / 6 capabilities covered
CapabilityDevevalGitHubJiraLinear
AI usage analysis (Cursor / Claude Code)
AI usage vs actual output
Real delivery impact scoring
Non-technical readable
Board-ready reports
Built for AI era

Who it's for

Built for decision makers.

Whether you write code or run the company — Deveval speaks your language.

For CEO

Non-technical founders

No technical knowledge required. See the answers without learning the jargon.

primary question

Is engineering output improving because of AI?

  • Why isn't AI increasing output?
  • Who is actually creating value?
  • Is our team / contractor reliable?

outcome

Board-ready answer without technical translation.

For CTO / VP Eng

Technical leadership

Get defensible conclusions backed by real data. Report upwards with confidence.

primary question

Where is AI adoption creating leverage, and where is it noise?

  • Who is using AI effectively?
  • Is the AI investment paying off?
  • How to report upwards?

outcome

Defensible coaching and reporting signal.

Pricing

Pay for clarity.

Simple per-developer pricing.

Paid evaluated seats1

Free includes 5 members for one evaluation.

Free

Try Deveval with one focused evaluation.

$0forever
  • Up to 1 team workspace
  • Up to 1 GitHub repository
  • Evaluate up to 5 team members
  • 1 administrator seat
  • One-time evaluation over 30 days
  • GitHub data sync when analysis runs
  • Basic DII metrics
Get Started

Starter

Popular

For growing teams measuring AI adoption monthly.

$3.50/mo

1 seats at $3.50/seat/month · billed yearly

  • Up to 3 team workspaces
  • Up to 10 GitHub repositories
  • 1-100 evaluated member seats
  • 3 administrator seats
  • Monthly automated evaluations
  • Automatic GitHub data sync
  • 90-day evaluation window
  • One-click PDF export
  • AI reports for members and teams
Get Started

Team

For larger orgs comparing teams and functions.

$5.60/mo

1 seats at $5.60/seat/month · billed yearly

  • Up to 10 team workspaces
  • Up to 25 GitHub repositories
  • 1-100 evaluated member seats
  • 5 administrator seats
  • Weekly automated evaluations
  • Automatic GitHub data sync
  • 365-day evaluation window
  • AI reports for members and teams
  • Cross-team comparison
  • Priority support
Get Started

Cancel anytime · Try free with 1 developer evaluation · Secure payment via Stripe

FAQ

Questions, answered.

Everything you need to know before your first evaluation.

Get started

Get your first impact report in minutes.

Connect GitHub, select repositories, click run. No meetings, no surveys, no tool installations.